skip navigation

2A State Tournament Analysis

By Brian Preece, 02/22/20, 4:45PM MST

Share

How would scoring the best wrestler vs. scoring all (JV) wrestlers effect the 2A standings?

 

2A Place

Team

Score Best 

Score All (Points Added)

# of Qualifiers

# of Placers

# of Finalists

# of Champs

 

1. 

Duchesne

244.5

297.5 (53)

21

15

4

2

 

2.

Altamont

220.0

261.0 

(41)

18

10

6

4

 

3.

Beaver

208.0

274.0 (66)

28

10

6

3

 

4.

Millard

205.0

249.0 (44)

26

11

5

3

 

5.

North Summit

194.0

209.5 (15.5)

23

10

3

2

 

6.

Enterprise

180.0

215.0 (35)

24

11

1

0

 

7.

Kanab

82.0

82.0 

(0)

11

4

2

0

 

8.

Gunnison Valley

80.5

80.5 

(0)

19

4

0

0

 

9.

Monti-

cello

63.5

63.5

(0)

12

4

0

0

 

10.

North Sevier

61.0

71.0 (10)

21

2

1

0

 

11.

Layton Christian

22.0

22.0 

(0)

1

1

0

0

 

12.

Parown

6.0

6.0

(0)

2

0

0

0

 

13.

UMA

0.0

0.0

(0)

2

0

0

0

 

 

2A Analysis:  The Scoring Best (what is used in 2A) versus Scoring All method used by the large classifications did produce significant differences.  Duchesne would have won in either method but Beaver would have leaped over Altamont for second place. Enterprise also would have bested North Summit for 5th place if this method was used.  And North Sevier would have switched places with Monticello finishing 9th instead of 10th.  The top five schools produced all the champs with Altamont having the most with four. Eight of 13 2A schools did produce finalists. Duchesne had the most placers with 15 while Millard and Enterprise were next with 11. But Altamont and Beaver, though one less than aforementioned teams, produced more finalists as each had six and that moved them to the second and third place finishes in the official standings.